India commits nearly $20B to move beyond smartphone assembly
India is committing nearly $20B to deepen its smartphone and semiconductor supply chains beyond final assembly.

India is expanding its industrial-policy push to capture more of the value inside smartphones and semiconductors, rather than remaining primarily a location for final assembly.
What happened
The government introduced a smartphone-manufacturing incentive programme worth roughly $6.5B and committed around $13.3B more to semiconductor manufacturing, equipment, materials, design and research.
India has already become an important production base for companies diversifying parts of their supply chains away from China. Apple and its manufacturing partners have increased local assembly, but many high-value components, production tools and materials are still imported.
The new programmes target the deeper layers of the supply chain: component suppliers, chip fabrication, packaging, equipment, design capability and domestic research. The objective is to create an ecosystem that can support more of the product lifecycle inside India.
Why it matters
Final assembly creates jobs and export volume, but much of the economic value in electronics sits in intellectual property, advanced components and manufacturing know-how. Countries that control those layers are harder to replace and capture more profit from each device.
For global technology companies, a larger Indian supplier base could reduce concentration risk. For India, the challenge is that semiconductor ecosystems require reliable power, specialised talent, logistics, patient capital and long-term coordination across many suppliers.
The bigger picture
The smartphone and chip supply chains are becoming instruments of economic and geopolitical policy. Governments are using incentives to influence where critical technologies are designed and manufactured. India’s spending does not guarantee that it will reproduce China’s ecosystem, which took decades to develop, but it signals a move from attracting individual factories toward building a broader industrial base. The eventual measure of success will be whether local firms move into higher-value components and whether global manufacturers can source more of what they need domestically.
