Augustus raises $180M for global dollar banking
Augustus is building regulated, programmable access to US dollar accounts and payment rails for fintechs and banks outside the US.

Demand for the US dollar is global, but direct access to US banking infrastructure is not. International fintech companies often depend on layers of sponsor banks, correspondent institutions and payment intermediaries.
What happened
Augustus raised a $180 million Series B at a $1 billion valuation. Tiger Global led the round, with participation from Hummingbird, QED and founders associated with Nubank, Ramp, Circle and Deel.
The company, previously known as Ivy, is building banking infrastructure for fintechs, digital-asset businesses and international banks. Its platform provides programmable dollar and euro accounts, domestic and international payments, stablecoin services, on- and off-ramps and credit products.
Augustus has received conditional regulatory approval to establish a US national bank. Its strategy is to combine a regulated banking entity with an API-first technology platform, reducing the number of intermediaries customers need to reach dollar clearing systems.
Why it matters
Global fintechs can scale customer interfaces quickly, but the underlying movement of money still depends on fragmented banking relationships. Those relationships can be slow to establish, expensive to maintain and vulnerable to sudden termination.
Owning more of the regulated infrastructure could give Augustus greater control over product design, risk management and service reliability.
The bigger picture
Stablecoins and conventional banking rails are increasingly being combined rather than developed as separate financial systems. Institutional customers want the speed and programmability of digital assets alongside regulated accounts, compliance and access to established payment networks.
Augustus’ valuation assumes it can complete the regulatory process and operate a bank safely while maintaining startup-level product speed. That combination is difficult: the licence can become a moat, but it also introduces capital, governance and supervisory requirements that pure software platforms do not face.
